Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) designs and sells iPhones, Macs, iPads and a growing lineup of services, and it just found itself in an uncomfortable public spat over memory chip prices. The company raised prices across MacBooks, iPads, Apple TV, HomePod and Vision Pro on June 25, and CEO Tim Cook pointed the finger squarely at memory suppliers for the increases.
At a Glance
- Apple trades at 289.36 dollars, up 2.58 percent on the day
- Market capitalization stands at 4.17 trillion dollars
- Price to earnings ratio of 34.9 with a 52 week range of 257.19 to 317.40 dollars
- Dividend yield of 0.37 percent and RSI of 46.97
- Micron reported fiscal third quarter revenue up 345.7 percent to 41.46 billion dollars
| Price | 289.36 USD |
|---|---|
| Day change | +7.27 (+2.58%) |
| 52-week range | 257.19 – 317.4 |
| Market cap | $4.17T |
| P/E ratio | 34.9 |
| EPS (ttm) | 8.29 |
| Dividend yield | 0.37% |
| RSI (14) | 46.97 |
| Volume | 65,242,045 |
Cook Blames Chip Shortage, Micron Points Back
Cook told the Wall Street Journal the week before the price hikes that memory suppliers were passing along steep increases because supply had tightened just as consumer demand for devices stayed strong. He called the situation unavoidable and unsustainable. Apple's public explanation centered on artificial intelligence data centers, which the company said had triggered an extraordinary surge in demand for memory and storage chips, the kind it has never witnessed move this quickly.
Hours before Apple's announcement, Micron (NASDAQ:MU) offered a different version of events. Chief Business Officer Sumit Sadana, speaking to the Journal after a strong earnings report, suggested that some large buyers, without naming Apple directly, had helped create the very shortage now hitting consumers. During the 2023 downturn, he said, aggressive customers used collapsing prices to negotiate deals so low that suppliers lost the margin cushion needed to fund new capacity.
Sadana recalled telling certain customers at the time that their pricing demands were not constructive, and that the resulting squeeze on margins forced the industry to shelve investments it would otherwise have made. Micron's own numbers back up how bad things got: gross margin turned negative that year, bottoming at minus 17.8 percent in its fiscal third quarter. Sadana stopped short of naming Apple, but the company has long been known for using its scale and long term purchasing contracts to extract favorable pricing from suppliers, and it remains one of Micron's largest customers for the memory and storage chips inside iPhones, Macs and iPads.
Markets React in Opposite Directions
The financial reaction to this exchange was immediate and lopsided. Micron's fiscal third quarter revenue jumped 345.7 percent to 41.46 billion dollars, with a gross margin of 84.6 percent, and its shares surged roughly 15 percent in after hours trading. Apple, by contrast, fell more than 6 percent to 275.15 dollars that day, its worst single day drop since April 2025.

Apple has since recovered some ground, with shares now at 289.36, up 2.58 percent on the day, though still well below the 317.40 dollar high of its 52 week range. The stock's low over that same period sits at 257.19 dollars, meaning shares remain roughly 9 percent off their peak even after the recent bounce.
What the Numbers Say
Apple's valuation remains rich by conventional measures. A price to earnings ratio of 34.9, against earnings that produce a market capitalization of 4.17 trillion dollars, prices in continued growth and pricing power even as component costs rise. The dividend yield of 0.37 percent offers little income cushion for investors, reflecting a stock still valued primarily on growth and buyback potential rather than payout.
Momentum looks neutral rather than stretched in either direction. An RSI of 46.97 sits almost exactly at the midpoint of the 0 to 100 scale, suggesting the stock is neither overbought nor oversold following its sharp single day decline and partial recovery. That kind of reading often shows up when a stock is digesting news rather than trending decisively.
The bull case rests on Apple's ability to pass rising memory costs onto consumers without denting demand, something its brand loyalty and pricing history suggest it can attempt. The bear case centers on margin compression if component costs keep climbing faster than Apple can raise prices, plus the reputational friction of a public disagreement with a key supplier over who caused the shortage in the first place.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Apple raise prices on MacBooks and iPads?
Apple said rising memory and storage chip costs, driven by surging demand tied to AI data centers, forced price increases across MacBook, iPad, Apple TV, HomePod and Vision Pro lines.
What did Micron say about the memory shortage?
Micron's Chief Business Officer Sumit Sadana said aggressive customers who negotiated very low prices during the 2023 downturn contributed to the industry pulling back on capacity investment, which later fed into today's tighter supply.
How did the two stocks react to this dispute?
Micron shares rose about 15 percent in after hours trading following its earnings report, while Apple shares fell more than 6 percent to 275.15 dollars, marking its worst day since April 2025.
What is Apple's dividend yield right now?
Apple's dividend yield currently stands at 0.37 percent, based on the stock's price of 289.36 dollars.
A Standoff With No Clear Resolution
Neither company has softened its position publicly, and the dispute highlights how deeply Apple's product costs are now tied to chip market cycles it does not control. With shares trading well within their 52 week range and RSI sitting near neutral, the stock's next move likely depends on whether memory prices stabilize or keep climbing through the rest of the year.
